Happy to be here

I understand that what she says is completely different from what she feels. There is a case that it is opposite， I am sure.

If she had told me not to change anything， I would have accepted it. Or even when I had wanted to change， I would have backwardly asked her if it would be OK to change or not.

I can accept the situation， but I cannot accept the idea that I was wrong.

---it might be stupid to continue this topic anymore. But there is still room to observe or find human issues within this topic or within myself. I will pick up here sometime， maybe.

------

Ph.D program in Nutritional Epidemiology.
still too great program for me.
Faculty members are well varied from policy makers to biochemists. Variety in faculties are reflected to variety in researches. Under the circumstance， I am supposed to review as many researches as possible.

Nutritional Epidemiology is the science to find the cause of adverse or beneficial health effect in population. Good example can be found also in Japan. Japanese governmental project reported in this spring that soy products are good for prevention of breast cancer. Today， this subject is focused on via medicine. The relationship between what people eat and what is the symptomatic outcome is the subject. Obesity， diabetes， hypertension， cardiovascular diseases， aging， dementia， cancers... everything can be targetted via examination of tendency of food/nutrient intakes.

blablabla...

The dean said，
"We can translate science to policy， or policy to science."

Translation.
Good word， I think.

Bye for now.